By Local Democracy & Public Affairs Reporter not affiliated to the BBC LDRS
In a dramatic and closely contested session, Oakham Town Council has voted to officially cease its pursuit of sole trusteeship for the Victoria Hall. The decision, which marks a significant turning point in the long-running saga surrounding the historic building, has left the future of the venue in a state of deep uncertainty.
The meeting was characterised by intense and at times unprofessional debate, highlighting the deep rift among local representatives regarding the financial and managerial viability of the project. With the council split down the middle, the Chairman was forced to exercise a casting vote to break the deadlock, ultimately cementing the decision to withdraw.
The atmosphere in the room turned particularly volatile during the proceedings. In a heated exchange, Councillor Christopher Clark leveled a sharp rebuke at Cllr Brookes, stating that he would become "the most hated person in Oakham" for his stance. Cllr Brookes, unmoved by the accusation, has since responded with a pointed rhetorical question: "Am I not meant to be that person already?"
The council’s resolution dictates that no further taxpayer funds will be directed toward the Victoria Hall. By stepping back from the trusteeship application, the council has effectively handed the responsibility for the hall's future back to the Trustees and the Charity Commission.
For those supporting the withdrawal, the move represents a necessary line in the sand. Critics of continued investment argue that the burden of the hall's decline should not rest on the shoulders of the town's taxpayers.
"It is my personal opinion that Oakham Town Council or its taxpayers are not responsible for the failing of the hall; the trustees are responsible for that failure," Cllr Brookes remarked following the vote. He expressed significant frustration regarding the fiscal history of the project, noting that the council had already invested nearly £100,000 into a facility that the trustees ultimately chose to close last year.
According to records over the last 3 years, this expenditure included:
£23,000 in direct taxpayer funding provided to help keep the hall operational.
Significant capital for the installation of a new boiler.
Substantial costs associated with various property surveys.
The decision brings an abrupt end to the town council's involvement in the day-to-day management of the Victoria Hall. With the council refusing to provide further financial life support, the facility now faces a precarious path forward.
