Eight Conduct Complaints, Conduct Responses Given From Cllr Martin Brookes
Oakham Town Council.
I have wasted a whole afternoon reading and responding to eight conduct
complaints.
I say wasted because the standards regime is currently pointless and
Oakham Town Councillor know that.
They can not lawfully impose any sanctions upon any other member so
they chose to exclude me from council working groups.
Cllr Hearn calls the exclusion democracy in action, she clearly has a
misunderstanding of democracy and how it works.
I am not not getting stressed about the conduct of Oakham Town
Council I do sometimes get annoyed, but not as much as them
In will be staying until the end of the four years and I will stand
again this club needs breaking and public money needs saving.
The cost to the taxpayer because the club OTC does not want me
on the council run into millions. Police Time, Court Costs,
Costs to RCC so far since May there has been around 15 complaints
I don't get formal notification of them all as was the case
of ex Mayors Mr Beech, who complains even if I mention
his name as a speaker at a public meeting. The monitoring
officer recently showed me pages of one of his pointless costly
complaints.
Dear Mrs Baker,
Oakham Town Council.
I have wasted a whole afternoon reading and responding to eight conduct
complaints.
I say wasted because the standards regime is currently pointless and
Oakham Town Councillor know that.
They can not lawfully impose any sanctions upon any other member so
they chose to exclude me from council working groups.
Cllr Hearn calls the exclusion democracy in action, she clearly has a
misunderstanding of democracy and how it works.
I am not not getting stressed about the conduct of Oakham Town
Council I do sometimes get annoyed, but not as much as them
In will be staying until the end of the four years and I will stand
again this club needs breaking and public money needs saving.
The cost to the taxpayer because the club OTC does not want me
on the council run into millions. Police Time, Court Costs,
Costs to RCC so far since May there has been around 15 complaints
I don't get formal notification of them all as was the case
of ex Mayors Mr Beech, who complains even if I mention
his name as a speaker at a public meeting. The monitoring
officer recently showed me pages of one of his pointless costly
complaints.
Dear Mrs Baker,
I have received notification about
Conduct Complaints URN: 19/15, 20/15, 21/15, 22/15,
23/15, 24/15, 25/15, 26/15
I note 20/15 and 24/15 both have their names withheld
it is my understanding this can be done in exceptional
circumstance. I do not believe withholding a Cllrs Name
falls within this category. I can see from the text of one of
those complaints it matches the content of an email received
from Cllr Paul Mills.
In the past when I have wanted to raise conduct complaints
you have refused to accept them if I failed to give you
the full code breaches and supporting evidence.
Is this no longer a requirement?
I suspect All these complaints were co-ordinated by Cllr
Alf Dewis Mayor who held private meetings with members
individually and in groups up to Wednesday evening this week.
When he met with "all the H's"
Some of the complaints are just opinion.
Some of the complaints are libellous.
Most of the complaints show a conspiracy to support Cllr Adam
Lowe and his current employment issue at Travis Perkins.
If Mr Lowe is found guilty and Mr Hill's allegations including
those to plot my downfall and homophobic conduct.
Oakham Town Councillors are going to look very foolish.
I would go as far to say the actions
of all the Councillors is bringing Oakham Town into disrepute.
I have asked Mr Hill if he stands by his allegations against
Cllr Lowe he says yes.
If Mr Lowe loses his job it will not be because of any fault
by me it would his alleged wrongdoings that would be at
fault.
On Wednesday evening Cllr Stubbs said after the meeting
to Cllr Lowe don't worry you have all our full support.
This reminded me of my court case when members gave
their full support to Cllr Charles Haworth his and other
members past and present conduct was described by the
District Judge Mr Temperley as "homophobic crude and
crass" very little has changed since I was found not guilty
of what this council continually accuses me of.
Below
is each allegation made against me in italic my response
follows
in bold.
19/15
From
Mr Stan Stubbs
I
consider that Cllr M Brookes is in breach of the code of conduct.
Firstly,
he shows a total lack of integrity, harassment to Cllr Adam
Lowe.
Disclosure
of an exempt confidential agenda item. Dishonesty,
and
finally a vindictive email to Cllr Adam Lowe.
Cllr
Brookes continually malicious attack of the council and its
members
is bring Oakham Town Council into disrepute.
My
Response:
Most
of Mr Stubbs allegation is opinion and nothing more
parts
are libellous and should be retracted or he should
resign
or face possible legal action. He suggest my actions
are
bring Oakham Town Council into disrepute.
Mr
Stubbs and the council have done that themselves
by
presenting complaints like this about another Councillor
because
they highlighted the council serious accounting
and
procedure failings.
20/15
From
witheld
Mr
Brookes constantly berates, and makes disparaging, rude
and
vindictive comments about fellow Councillors culminating
in
an email to Councillor Adam Lowe which is at least dishonest
and
deceitful it not libellous- copy available.
By
his attitude he is stopping the Council from moving forward
and
improving as much time and effort is taken up dealing
with
his outburst and bullying during meetings.
In
a fit of temper he also set of the fire alarm off in the Victoria
Hall
during a meeting on Monday 29th June
Please
also take time out to read his "Martin Brookes Blog" site
I
thank the complainant for reminding the council about
my
blog I am sure they are still one of my many thousands
of
daily visitors. This complaint is Libelous Video recordings
of
all meetings are available on youtube. Only last Wednesday
I
was subjected to at least two outburst of shouting and
finger
pointing from Cllr Blanksby who resigned the next
day.
Cllr Mills stood up and repeatedly called me a liar, stupid and
idiot, he apologised. Constant abuse and aggression comes
from
other Councillors not myself simply because I attempt to
make
the council accountable for its failing like not presenting
the
annual accounts to the external auditor. Most of the membership
bully
and exclude me this was proved on Wednesday when all the councils
working groups were dissolved and I was not permitted to serve on any
and Cllr Hearn described this a democratic act.
The
Fire Alarm was not activated during a meeting
the
test button was pushed when members locked themselves
in
a office after Cllr Lowe use force to prevent my own entry
after
an meeting was adjourned because the Mayor was refusing
to
let me speak about the council accounting failures.
I
spoke to Cllr Howard a fire officer and agreed it was wrong to
do
this and said I would not repeat that action.
21/15
From
Adam Lowe
Wednesday
12th August. Via a Blog which clearly state Me Brookes
is
a Councillor Oakham Rutland
A
posting on the Blog is based on a e-mail from a person unknown
to
Mr Brookes which contains suggested stories and lies about what
appears
to
myself, does not actually state my name so may not be me.
Mr
Brookes has posted the email and x-referenced it to me so anyone
reading
it the Blog will draw conclusions from what has been described
as
a cleverly worded e-mail and blog so as to 'suggest' that I am a
corrupt
person.
Mr Brookes has also sent the e-mail which is not proven is
actually
about
me and if it were is actually filled with total faleshoods, to my
employer.
Mr
Brookes has done this under the guise of public and my employers
interest.
Within
the email there is no actual allegation and certainly no proof it is
an
attempt to discredit by being suggestive. If Mr Brookes were acting
in the
public
good he should have suggested the originator of the e-mail to make
a
formal complaint to my employer and the police, I do not
believe this
has
been done. This breaches 1. of the Nolan Principles
Mr
Brookes has posted and sent an e-mail which are faceless and his has
no evidence, he even reports he does not know the person who sent the
e-mail to him. This shows he has breached 2. of the Nolan report.He
has shown bias against my self, a Cllr with out any conviction,
evidence or proof to this or any other significant allegations made
in the e-mail. Mr Brookes also sent several texts the same day after
he had sent this email. One text asked me to resign, this clearly
indicates that he is using this harassment and bullying tactic to get
me to resign from the town council.
Another
text asked if I would get sacked because of an element of this email,
this clearly indicates that Mr Brookes is using harassment and
bullying tactics to once again either cause me to be sacked
unlawfully by posting falsehoods and sending to my employer and
trying to force me to resign from the town council. These are not the
actions of a person claiming act in the public interest; he has
clearly decided I am guilty when as I have stated he does not know
who this person is. Mr Brookes has in amongst his smoke and mirrors
approach on his blog in his words lied unconditionally about me. Mr
Brookes states I was given the back door exit from the police
and
I resigned as a result of a harassment complaint against me, this is
total lies and unless Mr Brookes has some evidence then he is
breaching another
Nolan
Principle, 7. He is being dishonest.
The
originator of the email cannot be challenged by the police because
there
is NO allegation that is what the police have told me. This adds
weight to my comments that Mr Brooke's has breached the Nolan
Principles; he has made assumptions based on a groundless smear
campaign.
My
employer having reviewed an E-mail from Mr Brookes have
drawn
a similar conclusion and suggested that having read the Council
standards that Mr Brookes, if he is a Councillor has breached the
codes of conduct himself.
If
you require a copy of the blog post or e-mail you can either view it
on
Mr
Brooke's blog or I can get a copy of the page posted in, along with
the details of the police incident number from Leicestershire Police
Summary,
Mr Brookes has received an e-mail from a person he does not know
which contains nothing but lies and posted on the WWW and sent to my
employer and a large selection of people with the intention to
discredit, bully and harass and intimidate me to the point where I
resign from the council.
Mr
Lowe writes: A posting on the Blog is based on a e-mail from a person
unknown
to
Mr Brookes which contains suggested stories and lies about what
appears
to
myself, does not actually state my name so may not be me. So where is
the
conduct
issue here?
Mr
Lowe further writes: Mr Brookes has also sent the e-mail which is not
proven is actually
about
me and if it were is actually filled with total faleshoods, to my
employer.
Mr
Brookes has done this under the guise of public and my employers
interest.
Within
the email there is no actual allegation and certainly no proof it is
an
attempt to discredit by being suggestive.
If
you continue to read Mr Lowes conduct complaint against me
you
can see he contradict himself he goes onto refer to no allegations as
“significant allegations made in the email”
I
suggest Mr Lowe carefully read the copies of Mr Hills latest emails
they
do contain allegations. In the last Mr Hall confirms all his
allegations
against
Mr Lowe are true. It is not for me or you to prove those allegations
it
a matter now for Mr Lowes employer.
Then
Mr Lowe says If Mr Brookes were acting in the
public
good he should have suggested the originator of the e-mail to make
a
formal complaint to my employer and the police.
I
am not conducting an investigation into Mr Lowes alleged conduct
I
highlighting his wrong doing against me. I provided Mr Lowe with
copies of the emails
He
confirmed to me Mr Hill was known to him and told me he was sacked
and
denied the allegations relating to me exposing he was plotting my
downfall whatever that means and his homophobic conduct against me.
I
asked Mr Lowe in a text message if these allegations are true would
he
resign?
that is not bullying it is a simple question.
How
could he remain as deputy Mayor if the allegations are true.
Past
history leads me to think that the allegations made by Mr Hill
relating
to be could be true if not why did he inform me of those
allegations.
Mr
Lowe then says: These are not the actions of a person claiming act in
the public interest; he has clearly decided I am guilty when as I
have stated he does not know who this person is.
I
have not accused Mr Lowe of any guilt in relation to the allegations
relating to the misuse of a credit card at Travis Perkins or other employment matters I do believe he has spent time talking to fellow
Councillors
about me instead of working and I also believe Mr Hills
allegation
about his homophobic outbursts about me.
After
my court case Mr Lowe was the Mayor of Oakham and would
not apologise for the Councillors homophobic conduct exposed in
court.
He even sent messages which were critical of the district
Judge Temperley findings and would not accept I had been found
not
guilty. I shared these messages publicly and with my advocate at the
time.
Mr
Lowe makes mention of how I am lying about Leicestershire
Police
giving him the back door exit.
Leicestershire
Police told me this was true when I told Mr
Lowe
he said Leicestershire Police were breaching employer's
confidentiality
and he was threatening them with legal action.
Mr
Lowe does not want people to know when he worked at the
Oakham
Branch of Travis Perkins and as a special constable
at
Leicestershire Police he was using Travis Perkins computers
to harass me. I visited him and contacted his employer back then
I
also contact the police. I have documents published which show
this
happened. Mr Lowe will tell you and anyone else he only did
one
thing wrong this is not true. I am not willing to cloud the current
situation
by providing you with too much information about those
past
events.
What
I will add it has all been very unpleasant Mr Lowe even
persuaded DS Macdonald to serve me with a unlawful notice
banning
me from commenting or taking photographs of Cllr Lowe
When
he was made Mayor, The CPS made Leicestershire Police
retract
the notice.
Throughout
Mr Lowes Complaint he calls me a liar and dishonest these are words
used by many of the complainants.
Later
on I am to deal with Cllr Dewis complaint in that he reports
me
for the alleged same use of words. I sense double standards here.
Towards
the end of the allegations Mr Lowe says: “the emails contain
NO
allegation that is what the police have told me”
Which
is a true statement twice Mr Lowe says the email contains no
allegtions and at least once he says the email contains significant
allegations. I strongly believe Mr Lowe may be becoming forgetful or
something worse perhaps. If there are NO allegations against Mr Lowe
then why is he making all this fuss?
Cllr
Lowe says: My employer having reviewed an E-mail from Mr Brookes have
drawn a similar conclusion and suggested that having read the
Council standards that Mr Brookes, if he is a Councillor has breached
the codes of conduct himself.
Since
when passing on allegations to a retailer allegations of breaches
of
company policies and other activity from a past employer is a breach
of
council standards. I would say it may be a possible breach that I
have not passed the information onto the police.
Mr
Lowe says:
If
you require a copy of the blog post or e-mail you can either view it
on
Mr
Brooke's blog or I can get a copy of the page posted in, along with
the details of the police incident number from Leicestershire Police
Incident
number? That is all it is, it means nothing and Mr Lowe
knows
that as shown in h
is
previous comment about the email sender. Just like me the police
are
fed up with Oakham Town Council. I am fed up with the constant
harassment and exclusion and being blamed for the council not doing
anything since the May election. There is one of me and 11 of them
and they chose to be confrontational most of the time.
In
his summary Mr Lowe once agains says I am bullying by publishing the
email sent from Mr Hill there is fact more than one the most recent
seen by Mr Lowe contains some very serious allegations which bearing
in
mind his senior position in our community should not be ignored.
All
this activity conducted against me is an attempt to conceal the many
failing this council is attempting to hide.
Accounts,
Risk Assessment and more.
22/15
From
Michael Haley
The
Agenda for the Town Council meeting of 22nd
July 2015 included
a
confidential item and the public and press were excluded from the
meeting
for the duration of this item. All councillors, Including Martin
Brookes were made aware that this was confidential, meeting papers
marked as such Mr Brookes decided to ignore Oakham Town Council's
code of conduct (4.1.5) and publish the paper in its entirety on his
website
Papers
for the OTC meeting of the 19th
August 2015
Papers
for the OTC meeting of the 19th
August 2015 have been circulated to all OTC Councillors
Nice
man this newly co-opted councillor. Enjoys a chat with me and Cllr
Gale about most council issues he stood as part of an Independent RCC
group in May did not get elected.
The
first paper he mentions I assume is the one presented by Cllr Lucas
This
has been raised before and I refer you to my previos response.
Papers
for the OTC meeting of the 19th
August 2015 including the report from Street Accounts were as the
Cllr says distributed to all Councillors. These were also distributed
to Members of the public and RCC Oakham Ward Councillors by OTC.
Oakham Town Council have
also
published the document in full in the public domain.
I
reproduced screen shots of this public document.
By
publishing a non confidential document against the wishes of the
accounts is not a conduct matter.
Oakham
Town Council did have consent to publish the document online in the
public domain. You would be slightly pushed to find it.
My
reproducing what is quite a poor report about the councils accounts
and
Clerk is in the public interest.
On
the next complaint I comment in bold after each paragraph
23/15
From
Mrs Councillor Enid Joyce Lucas
I
wish to complain about the behaviour of Cllr Maritn Brookes whose
attitude has been a cause of concern to me over many years whilst he
has a member of Oakham Town Council
I
have not been a Councillor for very long so this paragh makes no
sense to me.
However
since his return to being a member in May 2015 he has been
more
aggressive and disruptive to most members and this gives me the
gravest concern.
How
dramatic, all the video evidence I have and published shows I have
never behaved as described above. It is a fact Mrs Lucas
has
become a concern to me so much so I sent you a recording of
her
telling me she has a right to be rude and disrespectful to me at
any
time she wishes. Sometime I may get provoked and raise
my
voice but never use violence at the last meeting Cllr Lucas
actually
hit me.
She
continues her complaint with this is just some of the problems I have
personally encountered.
June
29th
I gave a paper on creating more Alderman for Rutland, Two
candidates
were not aware that this was about to happen. It was printed on Red
paper indicating that it was confidential. The report was
confidential The report had CONFIDENTIAL written across the entire
length of the A4 sheet.
I
have already responded to this complaint and refer you to my
response.
But
as a summary Oakham Town Council has no authority to involve its self
in this type of project and a considerable amount of our time was
wasted by Councillor Lucas putting it simply she had a strop
because
this was pointed out to her.
Before
I started to explain the idea of submitting a report to Rutland County
Council, the press and public were excluded and I reiterated my
request for confidentiality. All members except Cllr Brookes handed
their papers back to the clerk for disposal. Cllr Brookes kept his
copy and the next day he blogged the the full page with comments.
This is a serious breach of the code of conduct.
Later
in the day I had to explain the situation to the candidates
Perhaps
Mrs Lucas will help them obtain a BEM just like her
undeserved
BEM we all had to endure over ten minutes of
waffle
from her about how those who applied for hers worked so hard to get
her BEM I am sure they did and no doubt a lot more work than Cllr
Lucas ever carried out to get her BEM.
2nd
August I was hosting the Forester Brass Band in Cutts Close Park,
This entailed welcoming welcoming the band and thanking everyone for
attending at the end of the concert.
Cllr
Brookes came to where my husband and I were sitting and tried to
engage me in conversation . I repeatedly told him to leave us alone.
This
is not true I approached Cllr Lucas and I believe Cllr Lowe
as
I was also attending the same event in my capacity as a town
councillor Mrs Lucas immediately object to my presence and as you
may
have heard on a recording I provided she told me she was entitled to
be rude to me when ever she pleased the recording is available on
youtube.
Cllr
Lucas then says she left the area and Cllr Brookes returned to speak
to my husband and told him that he had secretly recorded the
conversation, without my consent, and would be adding it to his blog.
This he did the very next day, I consider this a breach of my right
to privacy.
Yes
I did speak to Mr Bob Lucas sitting smugly wearing his masonic
symbol. I spoke to him so he could remind Joyce that I do record
encounters at times with my fellow councillors. He grunted a inaudible response and I walked away. It is not secret I record encounters with councillors it is my safeguard so often in the past I
would say Mrs Lucas or another said something and was called a liar.
There
is no privacy issue here the recording was made in a public space
and
the Cllr like myself was on duty. Only this week the police told me
they are finding the use of bodycams by the public very helpful.
Maybe
that
is why our deputy Mayor Cllr Lowe has started wearing a large one.
12th
August Cllr blogged a very unpleasant e mail from Mr Andy Hill
which
gave an account about a fellow Councillor. In it there were serious
accusations about his employment with a local firm of building
suppliers,
Cllr
Brookes admitted in the letter that he was writing as a Councillor.
Most
of the comments are unsubstantiated, And I find this the most serious
offence
to date.
I
think Cllr Lucas is referring to the email I received relating to
our
deputy Mayor Cllr Adam Lowe about his alleged criminal activities
and conduct at Travis Perkins where he works. This is not a conduct
issue.
It
is no surprise to me Cllr Lucas supports a homophobe she offered the
same support to Cllr Charles Haworth and Co.
Then
I am constantly reminded of the time she called me into a meeting in
Cllr Dewis's presence and said I should not blog photos of
transgender people when they were actually drag queens.
She
also accused me of bring the council in to disrepute when I
published
photographs of myself enjoying my birthday in a gay friendly bar. She
said Cllrs should not drink in gay bars.
Cllr
Lucas BEM is a spreader of malicious gossip.
On
more than one occasion she has tried to upset or offend me by
suggesting
I have a small penis, daft woman, my response to that each time has
Bob Lucas been telling you secrets.
Cllr
Lucas has been offered medication and has aggressively told me
“her
doctor has diagnosed I am the cause of of her mental condition”
Cllr
Brookes is in breach of the code of conduct on more occasions but
I
would like to just include these three items.
No
further comment
24/15
From
another withheld
The
first chunk of this complaints repeats other complaints regarding
the
confidential matters which I have previously responded to.
The
unknown person then says:
In
addition, I believe Cllr Brookes also breaches the code of conduct,
and goes against the 7 principles of public life, when he secretly
records people without their knowledge, and subsequently blogs, usually only part of, a conversation, thus abusing their right to
privacy.
This
can be observed when he secretly recorded, in part, a conversation with Cllr Joyce Lucas, and blogged it on August 02 2015
Cllr
Brookes also secretly recorded Cllr Alf Dewis when he turned up to
a
committee meeting, and as such was present as a member of the public,
and not only did he turn up early and walk straight in, it is evident
on his blog that he was actually recording on his phone as he walked
into the office. Prior to any conversation taking place! This clip is
shown on his blog on August 10 2015
This
cleary shows the complainant was not present and has been asked to
make this complaint Because I did not enter the office I entered the
public council chamber. 15 minutes before the meeting at RCC the
public are given 20 minutes prior access so I don't believe I have
done anything wrong if the person actually watch the video they will
see
I
walked into the chamber said good afternoon and was immediately told
to get out.
It
is no secret I record I am aware of least two County Councillor who
also record it is very commons these days.
This
person I assume was present at both these events I would suggest they
were not.
I
have published only 4 or 5 recordings in about the same number of
years, the first was Chris Hamilton when he was pissed and approached
and verbally abused me, I only publish part to prove
as
often the language can at time be to offensive for public ears.
The
second time was David Dilks a relation to of a former Mayor
The
first part of that recording was never published it was far to
offensive and only played to Leicestershire Police who lied to me and
told me this man was not known to anyone connected to Oakham Town
Council it turned out he was Paul Beeches stepson I believe Mr Beech
had the audacity to submit a conduct complaint after the event.
As
for there comments about secretly recording Cllr Dewis before
and
committee which showed his lack of manners can I ask you point out
the law to this person anyone can now record at meeting before, during or after a meeting the law is very clear about that right.
The
complainant refers to me recording Mr Waddington
during a visit to his home after he made false allegations about
me
to the council.
They
also go on and on about privacy invasion, and how a councillor
visiting Mr Waddingtons home brings the council into disrepute they
also claim the recordings are heavily edited.
Mr
Waddingtons Recording is unedited and despite his continual aggression and abusive words I kept my cool until the police arrived.
As can be heard here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgbQi5Jsf1Y
I
believe it is unacceptable that any person or councillor should have
to put up with the contiunual abuse and harassment I have to endure
from
people connected to Oakham Town Council.
I
am also very annoyed by the time I have to spend answering this
constant
allegations which I consider form part of the harassment
so
far up to this point I have spent over three hours on a Saturday
reading considering and replying to all these allegations.
26/15
From
Mrs Rebacca Hearn
Newly
co-opted Councillor described as a one trip pony by
Cllr
Joyce Lucas just out to get council property for free.
Cllr
Brookes has made some inflammatory statements on his blog; however I
am making a complaint against Mr Brookes for breaking confidentiality
of the town council July 23rd,
Mr Brookes blogged a confidential paper. All other councillors gave
it back to the Clerk to be destroyed.
I
do not return any confidential agenda items because I attempt to my
job as a parish councillor to my best and I keep all council papers
for
future
reference I can not remember everything. I am sure RCC Councillors
keep their yellow document safely filed away for future reference.
July
26-a photo of Barleythorpe Hall is on his blog. One can only assume
that he was on the property illegally.
I
have checked my record and find the photograph was taken on March 20,
2012 at that time the property was not fenced of as can be seen in
the photo it was then publicly owned I am fed up with constantly
being falsely accused of illegal activity by members of Oakham Town
Council, the recent conduct reminds of event of 2010 the first time I
became a town Councillor I was accused of Railway trespass when I
took a photograph of tambourine bridge. These Councillors really do
have a unhealthy grudge against me and it must stop the exclusion
from working groups is a repeat of 2010. and just look at Cllr Hearns
typical lack of basic manners she constantly refers to me as him or
he.
August
17, he blogged the report the accountants who had written
specifically that the report not be copied onto any form of
electronic device.
I
refer you back to a previous complainant about the same matter
I
simply screen shot from Oakham Town Councils website a publicly
funded
public document.
Cllr
Hearn finishes her complaint with the following statement
Councillor
Brookes, cannot be trusted with ANY information, he will use it to
forward
his agenda, discredit others who disagree with him, use the truth out of context reducing it to lies. He is vindictive, and untrustworthy.
Not
a bad statement from a newly co-opted Councillor who has attended two
or three meetings since. A very libellous
statement
perhaps the time has come
for
me to stop threatening legal action and start proceedings against
members like Cllr Hearn. I suggest she retract this statement and
resigns from the council
this
and her comments that exclusion of a member from taking part in
council activities is democracy in action only proves Cllr Hearn is
not fit to be a councillor.
The
final complaint from the mayor refers to Mr Hills email and to sum up
he says I am a bully and call him dishonest and generally attack Cllr
Lowe.
I
sent one email about this matter to Councillors and others including
Cllr Lowes
employer.
Cllr Dewis suggest Mr Lowe could be sacked as a result of this.
Fortunately
Mr Lowe does not work for Mr Dewis and I am sure Travis Perkins
would
only sack Mr Lowe if Mr Hills allegations of Criminality Homophobia and racism and bullying are proved. Mr Dewis has a habit of finding
people guilty and then investigating or not depending on how he feels
at the time.