weather

More forecasts: 30 day forecast Orlando
Showing posts with label City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label City. Show all posts

Saturday, November 22, 2025

Rutland County Councils Cabinet Votes Unanimously to Back 'North, City, South' Local Government Reorganisation Bid

Rutland County Councils Cabinet Votes Unanimously to Back 'North, City, South' Local Government Reorganisation Bid


Rutland County Council’s Cabinet today held a special meeting at 2:00 PM to determine its final preference for the proposed Local Government Reorganisation, a process which has been ongoing since last December

 

The Cabinet, led by Councillor Gale Waller (Liberal Democrat), voted unanimously to formally adopt the 'North, City, South' option. This proposal, which has been the sole focus of the council's internal officer work, would see Rutland join a new unitary authority encompassing Melton, North Leicestershire, and Charnwood. Two other unitary authorities would be created alongside this: one covering the City of Leicester and a third for South Leicestershire.

Cabinet members were highly complimentary of the extensive work undertaken by council officers throughout the reorganisation process.

However, the meeting also saw strong criticism directed towards the proposals submitted by neighbouring authorities. Deputy Leader, Councillor Andrew Johnson, described the competing proposals from larger councils as "arrogant". He further suggested that the primary motivation for these larger councils was merely to increase their council tax revenue base.

The decision follows an informal recommendation from the preceding full council meeting held yesterday. The past year has been characterised by significant political turbulence for the council, including local disagreements and a leadership challenge successfully seen off by Councillor Waller over the summer.

The chosen 'North, City, South' bid stands in contrast to the proposals from the larger unitary authorities. Leicestershire County Council prefers a two-council model: one covering a unified Leicestershire and Rutland, and the other maintaining the existing city boundary. Leicester City Council's submission also advocates for two unitaries: one significantly expanded from the current city to include areas like Oadby and Market Harborough, and the other covering the remainder of Leicestershire and Rutland.

The vote was not without internal dissent. Conservative members of the council chose to abstain from voting during the previous council meeting. They have cited a lack of viable choice, stating that any potential option involving Lincolnshire had been previously removed from consideration, leaving them unable to support the remaining proposals.

Council Leader Gale Waller introduced a key amendment to the final Cabinet resolution. She noted that other district councils, who are likely to align with the 'North Leicestershire' component of Rutland's bid, have yet to finalise their own formal decisions. Councillor Waller cautioned that this could result in "adjustments" to the final submission.

To ensure flexibility, the amendment grants Councillor Gale Waller and the Chief Executive the authority to make very minor, necessary amendments to the proposal before it is submitted to the government.

The leaders of the district councils aiming to form the North Leicestershire unitary authority are scheduled to convene next Wednesday to coordinate their final submission. All proposals are due to be formally submitted to the Government on Friday, November 28, 2025. The final decision on the future structure of local government in the region will rest with the Government.

After the meeting Cllr Gale Waller Leader of Rutland County Council, said: 

“Devolving more power and funding to councils is something I think most people support. This is what the Government has said it wants to achieve. However, the demands that Ministers have put on councils and the way they’ve gone about it – mandating a radical overhaul of local government in less than a year – has created huge pressure and a lot of frustration. I’ve said throughout that this is not something we want to do. However, pretending we can stop or simply ignore a government with a huge parliamentary majority benefits no one.

“I’ve also said time and again that councils must be led by evidence when deciding which LGR proposal represents the best option for our residents. I’m grateful to Members for the careful consideration they gave to each of the available LGR proposals at our Full Council meeting. I’d particularly like to thank our Scrutiny Committee for the speed and quality of work undertaken by its task and finish group, whose evaluation helped to inform our debate. After taking all of this into account, interrogating each of the three options open to us and listening to the thoughts and feelings of our residents, Cabinet determined that North, City, South is the proposal that provides the best chance of ensuring long-term financial sustainability and high-quality services for Rutland.

“It’s important to stress that Government – not councils – will make the final decision on the future makeup of local authorities, sometime next year. Indeed, Ministers may completely disregard the option we’ve chosen to endorse. The most important thing at this moment is that a proposal goes forward to the Government on 28 November that is as beneficial to Rutland as it possibly can be. We believe that, from the three available options, North, City, South is the proposal most likely to deliver future prosperity for our residents.”

The UK Government has indicated that, following the endorsement and submission of final LGR proposals on 28 November, it will look to hold a public consultation within specific areas in early 2026.

A Government decision on which LGR proposals to implement across England is expected in summer 2026. Shadow elections for new authorities are expected in 2027, followed by a vesting day when new councils officially take over in 2028.

The agenda and reports for Rutland County Councils Cabinet on Friday 21 November 2025 can be read in full on Rutland County Council’s websitewww.rutland.gov.uk/meetings. Minutes and a recording from the meeting will be published within one week of the meeting date.





Friday, November 21, 2025

Nine Members of Rutland Council Support Local Government Reorganisation Option: North, City, South Proposal, Amid Political Opposition, Videos of Councillors Speaking Phoenix eggs and the Berlin wall

Nine Members of Rutland Council Support Local Government Reorganisation Option: North, City, South Proposal, Amid Political Opposition, Videos of Councillors Speaking Phoenix eggs and the Berlin wall

Nine Members of Rutland Council Support Local Government Reorganisation Option: North, City, South Proposal, Amid Political Opposition

Alicia Kearns MP for Rutland and Stamford
Cllr Gale Waller Leader of Rutland County Council
original images enhanced with chatgpt. 


Rutland County Council is moving closer to settling its preferred future structure, with half of non-Cabinet members supporting the North, City, South (NCS) Proposal for Local Government Reorganisation (LGR). The recommendation will now pass to the Council's Cabinet, which is due to make the final decision today, Friday, November 21, 2025, led by Council Leader Cllr Gale Waller at 2.00 pm.

The NCS model proposes the creation of three unitary councils across the wider geographic area, a major step away from the current two-tier system of local government.

During last night's meeting, a vote was held among non-Cabinet councillors to express their preference for LGR options. The result highlighted a split among backbench members:

  • Nine members voted in favour of Option One: North, City, South Proposal.

  • Nine members chose not to express a preference.

The strong support for the NCS model among those who voted for an option provides a none legally binding recommendation to the Cabinet for the decision that will be forwarded to the government minister.

The North, City, South model, which the Council has invested significant time and resources into developing, is detailed across several key areas:

1. Single Tier of Local Government & Sensible Geography

The proposal would see the creation of three unitary councils based on existing district boundaries. Key features include:

  • Avoiding city boundary expansion and respecting local identities.

  • Clear separation between local delivery and a future Mayoral Strategic Authority (MSA), reducing strategic overlap.

  • Strength: Balanced populations (around 400k each); avoids a 'mega-council'; clear strategic/delivery split.

  • Weakness: Complexity of transition; requires strong programme management.

2. Right Size for Efficiency and Resilience

Financial modelling suggests the three-council structure is of an optimal scale, projecting £44.3 million in annual savings and long-term sustainability through reinvestment in prevention and housing.

  • Strength: Strong financial case; credible evidence signed off by all s151 officers.

  • Weakness: Requires harmonisation of pay and council tax; risk of diseconomies if governance is weak.

3. High-Quality and Sustainable Public Services

The plan incorporates a prevention-focused model, with an investment of £27m annually in neighbourhood teams by Year 10, forecast to deliver £91m in avoided costs. This model supports the integration of housing, health, and social care.

  • Strength: Strong prevention model; evidence-based approach; supports long-term demand management.

  • Weakness: Disaggregation of county services adds complexity; risk of service inconsistency during transition.

Community and Identity Commitments

Rutland County Council say the proposal has strong public support, with engagement showing 61% backing from over 6,000 residents. It explicitly commits to retaining the ceremonial counties of Leicestershire and Rutland and preserving civic roles, safeguarding historic identities. Neighbourhood governance is central, aiming to empower local decision-making at the community level (c. 50k population), though this would involve a reduction in councillor numbers from 384 to 196. Council tax rates would be harmonised within one year.

Political Fallout and Opposition

The Council's recommendation was quickly met with criticism from Alicia Kearns MP, who posted on social media immediately after the meeting, expressing her "disappointment" and "significant concerns" about the process.

Conservative Group's Alternative Motion

Alicia Kearns highlighted that the Rutland Conservative Group was denied the opportunity to table an alternative motion at the meeting. This motion would have formally expressed the Council's:

  1. Opposition to the "flawed, rushed and disruptive" LGR process.

  2. Regret that options to protect Rutland as a standalone Council or to merge with South Kesteven were not developed or under consideration.

  3. Concerns over the impact on residents, services, democratic representation, and local investment.

MP's Critique of the Process

In an accompanying video, Ms Kearns further claimed that it was "not true" that the Council could not have put forward its own proposal to the government, citing options like staying standalone or merging with South Kesteven. She stated that the lack of commitment from Rutland had put the South Kesteven bid at risk. She described the Council's decision to deny the Conservative Group's motion as "very, very concerning in the terms of democratic deficit", arguing it prevented the discussion of issues Rutlanders overwhelmingly wanted addressed.

The Cabinet decision today is therefore set against a backdrop of deep political division and strong local opposition to the current process and the specific options being considered.


Special, Cabinet - Friday, 21st November, 2025 2.00 pm

https://rutlandcounty.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=133&MId=3108


The Vote:

No councillor supported the Leicester City or Leicestershire County Council options. 

Nine councillors: Linda Chatfield (LibDem), Mark Chatfield (LibDem), Stephen Lambert (LibDem), Ray Payne (LibDem), Abigail West (LibDem), Steve McRob ((L), Ramsay Ross (L), Andrew Bown (Ind) and Kevin Corby (Ind) all supported Rutland being merged with North Leicestershire.

Cllrs: Karen Payne (C), Giles Clifton (C), David Wilby (C), Matthew Farina (C), Kiloran Heckels (C), Lucy Stephenson (C), Nick Begy (Ind), Oliver Helmsley (Ind) & Tracey Carr (Ind) all decided not to support any of the three options presented.