about Roger Begy the Conservative Leader of Rutland County Council.
His fellow councillors mentioned many times the word bullies when describing members of the
Rutland Anti Corruption Group.
Mr Begy knows all about bullying over the years there have been dozens of standards complaints about him
all accept this one have been swept under the carpet.
Mr Begy and his deputy and Gene Plews and others often conduct themselves in a unacceptable fashion.
The only reason this complaint was not swept under the carpet was it was witnessed by more than the
victim.
If Standards of England could have considered all the complaints ignored by the local standards committee
I am sure Mr Begy would have have been banned from public office.
I think it is disgraceful how he speaks to people in particularly woman as in this case.
After this case the local standards ruled it was fine for Roger Begy and other Tories to call me a Idiot in public.
I still feel this is also a breech of the code of conduct but as there is no longer any body such as Standards For England So Mr Begy and his Tory Chums are free to call the public anything they please.
And if any dares to challenge them they are likely to end up in court now.
Case Summary - Rutland County Council
| Case no. | SBE-06880-YMBGV SBE-07068-2XX5G |
| Member(s): | Councillor Roger Begy |
| Date received: | 14 Aug 2009 |
| Date completed: | 12 Nov 2009 |
ALLEGATION:
The member failed to treat others with respect.STANDARDS BOARD OUTCOME:
The ethical standards officer found that the member failed to comply with the Code, but in the circumstances of the case, no further action needed to be taken.CASE SUMMARY
The complainant alleged that Councillor Roger Begy failed to treat her with respect at two public events.The complainant alleged Councillor Begy raised his hand toward her in a menacing manner at a public meeting held on 13 June 2009. She also alleged that Councillor Begy called her a ‘prat’ while attending the opening ceremony of Oakham’s newly built public toilets on 22 June 2009.
On 13 June 2009 Councillor Begy waved his finger in front of the complainant’s face while being critical of her. However, the ethical standards officer did not consider that he did so in a menacing manner. The ethical standards officer did consider that during the conversation Councillor Begy mimicked the complainant’s voice and actions in a manner that was unnecessarily rude.
On 22 June 2009 Councillor Begy, on seeing the complainant appear wearing a large placard that was critical of Rutland County Council, said ‘Oh god, what a prat.’
The ethical standards officer considered that Councillor Begy’s conduct had fallen below that expected of an elected member and that he had failed to treat the complainant with respect
on both
13 June 2009 and 22 June 2009.
However, the ethical standards officer noted the context in which Councillor Begy’s conduct took place and accepted it had not been his intention to deliberately offend the complainant. The ethical standards officer considered it important that Councillor Begy has recognised that some of his behaviour was not appropriate and regretted any offence his actions may have caused. In these circumstances, the ethical standards officer considered that no further action need be taken.
