Leicester County Court, Corrupt, Ministry of Justice, The Information Commissioners Decision. MP Alan Duncan

Leicester County Court, Corrupt, Ministry of Justice, The  Information Commissioners Decision.

A Rutland resident would like  me to share with you the following, They have achieved this outcome on their own after MP Alan Duncan declined to help them.

Keywords: Property, Harassment, Rutland County Council,

Data Protection Complaint

casework@ico.gsi.gov.uk <casework@ico.gsi.gov.uk>

Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:20 PM

20 December 2012

Dear

When we receive data protection complaints, our obligation is to make an assessment. An assessment is the Information Commissioner’s view about whether an organisation has followed the rules of good practice for handling information in the Data Protection Act 1998 (the DPA).

Our aim is to ensure that organisations deal with personal information properly in the future. Our assessment decisions can help us to decide whether we should take action against a particular organisation.

Our decision

I wrote to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) about this matter and have now received its response. On the basis of all of the information provided by you and the MOJ, we have decided that it is unlikely that MOJ has complied with the requirements of the DPA in this case.

As you are aware, we asked MOJ about the safeguards that are in place to help ensure it handles personal data properly.

It is my view, despite Leicester County Court (LCC) adhering to ‘normal court business’, that it would be good practice for LCC to consider your request under the provisions of the DPA. The sixth data protection principle says that personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects.

I made recommendation to MOJ that, in order to maintain good practice and to safeguard against future breaches of the DPA, that the MOJ remind court officials about their obligations under the DPA. It is my view that court officials should be familiar with information requests, and the associated processes in keeping with the statutory framework.

Having carefully considered all the facts of this case, we have decided that formal regulatory action is not required in this case at this time. However, you should be aware that we keep a record of all assessment decisions and will take these into account if we receive further complaints about MOJ. The information we gather from complaints may form the basis for regulatory action in the future.

Next steps

However, most organisations want to put things right when they have gone wrong and learn from complaints that are raised with them. We have therefore asked MOJ to consider the information we have provided during the course of this assessment and take steps to prevent the situation from happening again.

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.

____________________________________________________________________

The ICO’s mission is to uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF

Tel: 0303 123 1113 Fax: 01625 524 510 Web: www.ico.gov.uk

Leicestershire Police, Ministry of Justice, Code of Practice, Kenneth Anthony Ruddle, Ruddle Merz, Patricia Tena Ruddle, Tish Ruddle

Leicestershire Police, Ministry of Justice, Code of Practice, Kenneth Anthony Ruddle, Ruddle Merz, Patricia Tena Ruddle, Tish Ruddle.

One week ago, I received a telephone call from Sgt Shellard, (I don't disagree with a member of the public's description of  him, "A young man with a short fuse") He told me a person had been arrested for crimes
committed against me. He said "I should be grateful for the work he and Inspector Mistry had done for me?
Since that call I now communicate with a rather more human face of Leicester Police Sgt Hodson.

Leicestershire Police continue to refuse to release the Identity of the suspect, whom Sgt Shellard told me
is responsible for some pretty vile activity.

The Ministry of Justice / CPS has a code of practice

http://www.cps.gov.uk/victims_witnesses/victims_code.pdf

I have notified Leicestershire Police of their breaches of this code, in particular.


Arrest and Bail
5.14 If a suspect is arrested on suspicion of an offence in respect of relevant criminal conduct, the
police must notify the victim of this within one working day for vulnerable or intimidated victims and
no later than five working days for all other victims.


5.16 If the suspect is released on police bail to return to the police station the police must notify
vulnerable or intimidated victims of this event, reasons for bail and any relevant bail conditions within
one working day and notify other victims within five working days.

5.17 If police bail is altered by change of bail conditions, date of return on bail or bail is cancelled,
the police must notify vulnerable or intimidated victims of these events and the reason within one
working day and notify other victims within five working days.


They have failed to notify me of the reasons for bail and any relevant bail conditions.
If the part of those conditions is the suspect should not approach or communicate with me.
Does that mean because they have committed five years of crimes with anonymity they are
entitled to keep that anonymity throughout?

If you have stumbled across my blog for the first time you may be wondering about the names in
the title of this post,

These are names that have come out of my own investigations, if they are correct it does not surprise
me the police have failed to act in the past. Why would Inspector Monks take action against his local
Tory buddies?

I traced the email address registered to a stat counter on a offensive homophobic web publication and
the name Ruddles is contained in that email address, the secondary account led to the name Kenneth Anthony Ruddles, who is or was a director of three local limited companies all containing
Ruddle Merz in the name. He is married to Trish Ruddle who is Patricia Tena Ruddle who will this year
take up the role of High Sheriff Of Rutland. It is possible some one could have used their identity to set
up the email accounts.

Sgt  Hodson said "when the person is charged it will be everywhere" is this why Leicester Police
are reluctant to reveal who has been arrested?

Government to close HMP Ashwell Prison Rutland by the end of March

 Above one of the photographs I took outside the prison on the day of the big riot

HMP ASHWELL Prison in Rutland will be closed by the end of March, the Ministry of Justice has announced.

on Saturday, October 23, 2010 The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) Oakham Save HMP Ashwell gathered in the Market Place an effort to try and save further Rutland job losses.