By Local Democracy & Public Affairs Reporter for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland, not affiliated to the BBC LDRS
.jpg)
Rutland County Council Meeting Over shadowed by Public Protests Amid Fights to Preserve County Status
Tensions boiled over at a special meeting of Rutland County Council last night, as a packed chamber and vocal crowds outside debated the future of the county's ceremonial status following a controversial Local Government Decision Announcement.
The high-stakes meeting, called to consider special motions put forward by Cllr. Lucy Stephenson and Cllr. Andrew Dinsmore, was disrupted before official business even began.
The session opened with the Chairman paying tribute to a long-serving council employee who had recently passed away. However, as the tribute was being read, the proceedings were drowned out by shouting from members of the public standing outside the building, windows were opened as all temperatures soared inside and outside the building
Due to strict fire safety regulations limiting capacity in the chamber, access had been restricted, leaving many locked out. This sparked anger among those gathered outside, with some demanding the Chairman address them directly, while others claimed they had reserved seats and complained they were being denied entry.
Protesters voiced wider frustrations, accusing the council of failing to protect local democracy and stripping away Rutland's historic identity.
In response to the growing commotion, the Chairman temporarily adjourned the meeting. When the session reconvened, the Chairman attempted to complete the tribute and hold a minute of silence, but the solemn moment was once again interrupted by a disruption.
Once order was restored, the council turned to the core agenda: addressing the impact of the recent government decision on Rutland's ceremonial status and distinct local identity.
Cllr. Stephenson and Cllr. Dinsmore pressed for decisive action, bringing forward two primary demands:
A formal requirement for the Leader of the Council to petition the Secretary of State. This demands legislative provisions to safeguard Rutland’s ceremonial county status, the ancient offices of the Lord Lieutenant and High Sheriff, and the continued legal recognition of the name "County of Rutland," complete with a clear implementation timetable.
A call for the Leader to write to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government. The motion urged an urgent review into whether a proposed two-unitary model genuinely delivers on efficiency, financial sustainability, and local democratic accountability.
During the debate, an amendment to the proposals were accepted, while an alternative proposal brought forward by the deputy leader of the council, suggesting the local Member of Parliament should take the lead was rejected by the council. The motion's proponents emphasised that the Council Leader must take direct ownership of the fight for the full council rather than avoiding action.
Following impassioned speeches from members across the chamber, the vote was held. The motions successfully passed, mandating the Rutland County Council leader to formally write to the Secretary of State and take up the fight to preserve Rutland's historic future.
Rutland County Council Meeting Special Meeting Fights to Preserve County Status Deputy Leader, Cllr Andrew Johnson Speaks to Rob Persani, Rutland and Stamford Sound.
Rutland County Council Meeting Special Meeting Fights to Preserve County Status Cllr Lucy Stephenson Leader of the Opposition Speaks to Rob Persani, Rutland and Stamford Sound.
Rutland Council Passes Motion Challenging Government Mega-Council Plans, Welcomed by MP Alicia Kearns
.jpg)
Member of Parliament for Rutland, Alicia Kearns, has expressed relief following a recent decision by Rutland County Council to formally challenge government plans regarding local authority restructuring.
During a special council meeting, a Conservative motion passed requiring the council to write to the government with two primary demands:
Demand the publication of the underlying evidence used to justify forcing Rutland into a Leicestershire mega-council.
Request a clear legislative timeline to ensure Rutland's historic ceremonial status is legally preserved.
Alicia Kearns praised the outcome as a crucial shift in the council's approach to the proposed changes.
"This marks the first time the Council will stand up for us throughout this process and demand some answers rather than just going along with it all as if there’s public support for Government plans," Kearns stated.
She noted that a counter-motion put forward by the Liberal Democrats which she argued would have absolved the council of taking action was ultimately voted down by the chamber.
Despite the positive outcome regarding the motion, Alicia Kearns voiced strong concerns over logistical issues and attendance at what she described as the biggest change to Rutland since the 1970s.
Alicia Kearns expressed disappointment that 12 out of the 27 councillors failed to attend the meeting.
Reports indicated that numerous residents were turned away and refused entry to the chamber.
Compounding the public access issues, the council failed to ensure the online live-stream of the meeting was operational.
(Editor's note: It is important to note that it is not normal for Rutland County Council to hold a full council meeting during the month of August. Many of the members who were absent had previously booked holidays before this special meeting was called, and two councillors are currently very unwell. A full video recording of the meeting will soon be published by Oakham and Rutland News)
Reflecting on the relationship between her parliamentary role and local governance, Alicia Kearns emphasised the importance of a unified front while maintaining rigorous oversight.
"Ultimately, I’m just relieved to finally have the council and I working on a more similar page," Alicia Kearns said. "It is our shared duty to stand up for our communities, and it’s always better for us to do it together, but I will make no apologies for scrutinising the council and holding them to account when they fail to fight for us and make my work representing us to Government harder."
Including Market Place, Market Street, Church Street, Crown Walk,
John Street, Melton Road and Deans Street and Gaol Street.
https://oakhamandrutlandnews.co.uk/highstreetoakham
