Sonara Studios, Mill Street, Oakham, Rutland, New Signage
Welcome to the Oakham and Rutland News blog! I'm Martin Brookes, your Community Editor, excited to bring you the latest updates from the vibrant heart of Oakham and Rutland. Our new local news website is your go-to source for comprehensive coverage of everything happening in our community. From breaking news and local events to community spotlights and personal reflections, we've got you covered.
Showing posts with label Sonara Studios. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sonara Studios. Show all posts
Friday, May 27, 2011
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Sonara Studios, 20 Mill Street, OAKHAM, Rutland, LE15 6EA, Photograph 2011
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Sonara Photographic Studios Oakham Planning Application
Sonara Studios Oakham Planning Application
APP/2010/1163/DTR (ADV) Mr Shushil Pattni (Sonara Studios)
Installation of 1 No. Illuminated fascia sign and 1 No. illuminated hanging sign 20 Mill Street Oakham
As the property is listed a listed building it also had to apply for (LBA) APP/2010/1164/DTR
This application was not considered it was not explained why this was ignored and I assume the Clerk has accepted it was rejected because of the first vote?
The Town Council recommended refusal because of the lighting and the sign was to close to a ladies home and it was red!
It was pointed out the Town Council had also rejected lighting in the conservation area.
Cllr Lowe thought the lighting may have some effect on drivers and the visibility of the traffic light.
Cllr Lucas said she did not not like the swan neck lighting that was on other shops like Cavells and the Indian Restaurant and Swans and wondered if Rutland County County Council had granted planning permission.
APP/2010/1163/DTR (ADV) Mr Shushil Pattni (Sonara Studios)
Installation of 1 No. Illuminated fascia sign and 1 No. illuminated hanging sign 20 Mill Street Oakham
As the property is listed a listed building it also had to apply for (LBA) APP/2010/1164/DTR
This application was not considered it was not explained why this was ignored and I assume the Clerk has accepted it was rejected because of the first vote?
The Town Council recommended refusal because of the lighting and the sign was to close to a ladies home and it was red!
It was pointed out the Town Council had also rejected lighting in the conservation area.
Cllr Lowe thought the lighting may have some effect on drivers and the visibility of the traffic light.
Cllr Lucas said she did not not like the swan neck lighting that was on other shops like Cavells and the Indian Restaurant and Swans and wondered if Rutland County County Council had granted planning permission.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)