Showing posts with label Helen Briggs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Helen Briggs. Show all posts

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Rutland County Cllr Nick Wainwright likes send sex to your friends (App). ?

Recent FaceBook Activity of Conservative Rutland County Councillor Nick Wainwright
I always wondered what Councillors did with there i phones and computers at meetings, so I took a peek. 
I wonder who he is sending Sex to.  is it one of his newer friends shown below?

Cllr Terrance King?

or another of his face book friends Chief Executive Helen Briggs? 


I did not check out the application as it was not designed by facebook.
 

Wall

RECENT ACTIVITY

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

I received a email from Helen Briggs Rutland County Council this evening.

I received a email from Helen Briggs Rutland County Council this evening.

I am not sure what she means by defamatory, is that a new word for criticism. Mentioning an officers name like Helen Briggs is not defamatory just because she does not like to be criticised. 

The content of my blog does not contain anything illegal or defamatory, it has been checked, by various people including PC Lloyd who was asked to read every page, His response was it was boring. I don't  know who asked the poor man to read all the posts.
At first I agree at meeting to a block, soon changed my mind when I realised this would be giving the Council the opportunity to do something they had wished to do for some time. At that meeting I was not happy because I had traced the abuse to Rutland County Council it was the legal department who suggested it was coming from the library. After I went away and thought things through I insisted the council should ban the person who was responsible for posting vile comments if it was a library user not stop everyone else viewing.

I had no proof it was coming from the library and felt the council were using this an escape, then I obtained proof that some of the most disgusting filthy comments had been posted from the Council Chamber.

Is it defamatory to say a officer is rude?

Now Helen Briggs has spent so much time thinking how to reply to my complaint, she can get on with finding the bank statements for me and the member of public who made FOI request.

Then get on and reinvest the £19 million to earn a better sum of interest. I hope a Home Economics Degree doesn't tell her to hide it in the tea pot in the kitchen cupboard.

I hope that is not defamation?

Below is Helen Briggs Email 
Dear Mr Brookes

Further to your complaint (email dated 31st January 16:14).

I should like to start by apologising for the fact that the block on members of the public being able to access your blog from the computers in the library has been implemented without you having been informed in advance.

However, I am satisfied that it is the correct action for the Council to take in the circumstances.  You will recall that towards the end of last year we did ask whether you would like public access to be blocked in response to what both you and Council officers considered to be highly inappropriate and offensive material being uploaded when there was some reason to believe that the material was being posted from the library computers.  After initially supporting the idea, you quickly changed your mind, which you were quite entitled to do.  At that time the way in which the internet service was provided to the library would have made it difficult to arrange for the blocking of the website, so we complied with your request.

Mr Pook did advise you at that time that we were intending to install new arrangements which would enable the Council's own IT team to regulate access more directly.  It is the completion of that installation which has led to the blocking of access.  From the Council's point of view it is considered that some of the content which you are posting yourself is defamatory of certain individuals connected with the County Council, especially officers.  Further, enabling continued unrestricted access by the public risks the addition of yet more undesirable material of the type which you too have said you would like to cease.

Access is now blocked also as far as the wireless network in the Catmose meetings area is concerned.  The combination should eliminate the scope for  material offensive to you being posted by any association with the Council's systems, a development which I imagine you would welcome.


Helen Briggs | Chief Executive
Rutland County Council
Catmose, Oakham, Rutland LE15 6HP
t: 01572 758203 | f: 01572 758385 | e: hbriggs@rutland.gcsx.gov.uk




Rutland County Council

Customer Service Centre: 01572 722 577

Visitor Parking Information & Map:
http://www.rutland.gov.uk/visitormap

Email Enquiries: enquiries@rutland.gov.uk
Council Website: http://www.rutland.gov.uk
Visiting Rutland? http://www.discover-rutland.co.uk

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and may not be official policy.
Internet email should not be treated as a secure form of communication.
Please notify the sender if received in error.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Local Rutland Business Woman asks Roger Begy leader of Rutland County Council to remove Helen Briggs

A Rutland Resident and Business woman has wrote to Roger Begy leader of Rutland County Council asking for the removal of the Chief Executive and then goes on to offer her service as a cost cutting measure.

From: #######@hotmail.com
To: rbegy@rutland.gov.uk
Subject: ######### meeting you in Foyer.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:00:25 +0000


Dear Roger

Again, thankfully serendipity came to the rescue and I was able to talk to you in the foyer. 

#########

#########

##########
 
#########
 
I make you an offer: remove Mrs Briggs and I will be pleased to offer my talents to the RCC in her place for half her wages and work twice as hard as she does in reality.  Now that is a saving worth pursuing.

Your truly

######## (Hons)BMS

Rutland County Council Investments Hellen Briggs and Roger Begy

It would appear someone is not happy Rutland County Council's Investments are public knowledge.

It has prompted a response from Helen Briggs Chief Executive of Rutland County Council



The response to my e-mail from Mrs Briggs is gratefully received.

I am pleased to hear, the member of the public is receiving copies of statements.

 Please can I also be emailed copies FIO request.

At the meeting the member of public made a very public request, to see the statements and this request was refused outright by Mrs Briggs, why does the public always need to resort to FIO.

What does Mrs Briggs and our council  have to hide?

The Council does not listen to the public and it is not transparent.

The email does not explain why Council Leader Roger Begy lied.

 At  a previous public meeting "the council had received all the £1,000,000 invested in Iceland"

 I can not see how it is possible for either me or other members of the public to have heard incorrectly?

Rutland County Council does not listen to the public and it is not transparent. Councillor Gale seems to be the only Councillor listening to the public. At Wednesdays meeting he mentioned the majority of the public he meets, say their council is not listening.

From

Martin Brookes








From: HBriggs@rutland.gcsx.gov.uk
To: martinjbrookes@hotmail.com;
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:53:05 +0000
Subject: RE:



The information quoted in Mr Brookes email of January 22 was provided as part of freedom of information request from a member of the public and reflected the position as at the 17 January.  At that time the amount owed to the Council from Heritable Bank was £546,000 on an initial investment of £1,000,000.

At the Public Budget consultation both the Leader and Chief Executive made the audience aware that we are advised the Council will get back over time 85% i.e. £850,000 and that to date we have received about 50% i.e. £500,000.

On 18 January a further repayment of £47,000 was received bringing the total repayment received to date to £501,000 and the balance owed £499,000.  We have therefore received just over 50% of the original £1m invested.

Surplus cash balances are invested in such a way to generate maximum income whilst leaving enough flexibility to bring cash back into the Council’s main bank account at short notice.  This is the reason for the range of interest rates earned, i.e. the longer the money is invested for the higher the interest rate.

The request made to see copies of bank statements has not been refused, the Council are in the process of compiling the information.



Rutland County Council £19.634.173.80 cash investements

RUTLAND COUNTY COUNCIL

INVESTMENTS AS AT 17 JANUARY 2011

Rutland County Council has public money invested with the following organisations:

HSBC - Sterling Liquidity Fund
HSBC - Money Market
Coventry Building Society
Lloyds TSB
Bank of Scotland
London Borough of Brent
Skipton Building Society
Santander
Nationwide Building Society
Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation
Barclays Bank
Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation
Clydedale Bank
Yorkshire Building Society
Principality Building Society
NMRothschild&Sons
Heritable Bank - ln Administration






£19.634.173.80 is the total sum invested and interest rates are very poor these range from 0.33% in the HSBC (a total disgrace) to the higher 1.8% paid by both Lloyds TSB and The Bank of Scotland.

What interests me the most is Heritable Bank this pays 6.09%

This is  a Landsbanki owned Scottish Bank,

The Leader of Rutland County Council Roger Begy said we had lost £1,000,000.00 in this bank.

Last year he told the public "we had got it all back"

This week The Leader of the Council Roger Begy said he never said such a thing?

He said Rutland County Council had recovered £850,000 and it was likely the Council will loose £125,000
This was confirmed by Helen Briggs Chief Executive.

Why are they lying?

A freedom of information request reveals there is only £546,096.29 deposited in this account where is the other  £453903.71

I am aware a member of the public has made a Freedom of Information request to see hard copies of Statements relating to all the above investments. Rutland County Council has refused to provide these. Why? What do they have to hide? This is public money.

I am not sure who Rutland County Council employs these days to control finances, but surely this needs to be looked into.

Why are the public being asked how should we save £650,000 of important service when there is this amount of money invested.

£650,000 is a small amount of the total sum the council intends to cut, another 100+ staff will be going soon.
Posted by Rutland Resident at 1/22/2011 08:18:00 PM
Read More: http://martinbrookes.blogspot.com/2011/01/rutland-county-council-1963417380-cash.html




Rutland County Council

Customer Service Centre: 01572 722 577

Visitor Parking Information & Map:
http://www.rutland.gov.uk/visitormap

Email Enquiries: enquiries@rutland.gov.uk
Council Website: http://www.rutland.gov.uk
Visiting Rutland? http://www.discover-rutland.co.uk

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and may not be official policy.
Internet email should not be treated as a secure form of communication.
Please notify the sender if received in error.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Roger Begy Leader of Rutland County Council Said We Could Be in Doo Doo next year!

Roger Begy Leader of Rutland County Council Said 'We Could Be in Doo Doo next year!'

 Rob Persani

Rutland County Councils Question Time at Rutland County Museum hosted by Rutland Radio's Rob Persani

Rob welcomed us and then introduced The Leader of Rutland County Council Roger Begy.

Mr Begy asked if we could all hear him? he said he would normally rely on Councillor Joyce Lucas to let him know, but she was not here. Ex Councillor Alan Walters giggled and ex MP hopeful Helen Pender Cheered quietly!

He went on to give us an interesting presentation, this included Rutlands UPS and DOWNS

Top of the list was the new Catmose Sports Hall, to be managed by Stevenage Leisure. This project funded by central government should be open on time towards the end of February.

Social Services had been rated excellent.

The New Business starter units have been a great success.

Rutland has received 7 awards for tourism, the highest achievement for the whole of the East Midlands.

Rutland had also done well with Recycling.

He thanked Oakham in Bloom and Uppingham in Bloom, reminding us these groups are all voluntary.

The Downs were:

The Closure of RAF Cottesmore and Ashwell Prison.

People killed or seriously injured on our roads was far to high and rising. (Slow Down)

Children at risk had risen to unbelievable levels 200+ (what are these parents doing to their children shocking)

He then moved onto the Comprehensive Spending Review stating there had been a lot of pre publicity.

2011/2012   -14.3%

2012/2013  - 9%


No increase in Council Tax this year.


The Council is making savings in the following ways:

Wage Freeze

Restructuring

Terms and conditions of Employment

all this in house action is expected to save £2.6 million.

There will also be a reduction in use of Consultancy Services.

Contract reviews are expected to save  £220,000

The Council structure is now known as one Council

made up of three departments

(sorry I cant resist the Trinity headed and looked down upon by god Helen Briggs)

People Departments  Directed by Carol Chambers

Places Departments  Directed by Aman Mehra

Resources Departments Directed by  Debbie Muddimer

(at tonights meeting we were told Chief Executive earns £112,000 last year the web site said £119,000 today it says £109,185 ??)

He then went on to say the Council is looking at different ways of working,

Shared Services, External Contracts, Partnerships.

He said Peterborough City Council had provided good trading standards and they had extended the service contract and were considering handing over legal services (does that mean goodbye Mr Pook :-(  my experience of trading standards is crap, they send traders a form once a year asking, do you display no refund notices at the point of sale? the shop I worked for always gave refunds, but if you were one of the retailers who refuses a customers statutory right are you going to admit it on a form? I think not )

He also said democratic services may be contracted to Melton Borough Council.(poor Ms Stokes)

Other services are currently contracted out to a number of other Councils, he named a few:

Wigston, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire.

(I am beginning to wonder what Rutland does for itself? this is not true independence, we seem to rely on so many others.)

He then moved onto the Medium Term Financial Plan

A lot of figures that showed Net spending total is 30.208 million rising to 32.079 million over the next four years.

The Council was not sure if it was going to receive 2.5 million of government grants, so it has assumed a 25% reduction.

The Council expects to have 1.5 million in reserves

He said building new homes could be an option, but later said Council Tax income could not be considered at planning meetings.

He said the uncertainty about income could  "mean we are in doo doo next year" 

The Council is proposing to make the following savings by cutting a number of services totalling £605,000

We were asked to vote at the end of the evening. I refrained from voting, I did not see the point of the exercise with so few people attending.

The Council is hoping Voluntary Organisations could help provide council service in the future.

A number of Growth Proposals were shown.

He then moved onto Future Issues

The County is likely to be effected by NHS reforms, Public health issues (smoking and drinking)
Who is going to fund Academies if this status is granted to any Rutland Schools, will the money come from Rutland or Central Government? (looking forward to see the new Catmose Academy once the building is complete)
School funding is changing, funding will be awarded per pupil.
Rutland needs Economic Development and Broadband or lack of it is seen as a stumbling block, (a job for Rutland Telelcom?) 
Local Development new homes and supermarkets were all issues having to be dealt with.
(Planning is hated by Mr Begy he said it is the bane of him and there was me thinking it was me!)

It is suggested Town Councils could take over services currently provided by the County Council. (are they having a laugh, it maybe possible for the regimented gentlemen of Uppingham Town Council to do a good job but  Oakham Town Council................. No disrespect to the new members The poor Mayor is already stressed with the current work load)
Mr Begy said this was a exciting opportunity for both Town Councils, an opportunity for Town Councils to put their mark on their towns. Hope its not Doo Doo Councillor Lucas would not be pleased.)

Concluding Mr Begy said "Its a different world out there and we need to look further than our noses and we have everything under control."

Now it was back to Rob, who read questions that had been sent in previously as requested, there was a slight change, questions were also allowed to be asked by anyone present.

A question was asked about the councils finances, how much money did the council have saved? what was its purpose and how much interest was earned.......

Mr Begy responded "£19.6 million was held on deposit in various places and most deposits earned dam all" !

 He also mentioned the £1 million lost in Iceland, he said the Council had recovered £850,000.

I reminded him at the last public meeting, he had told the public the whole sum had been recovered. He told me he did not say this. A member of the public said afterwards I was correct because they wrote it down.

At this point Mr Begy thought its would be nice to introduce his non political cabinet members.

He started with the "Pretty Side" his words not mine!

Mr Hugh E G Rees (Conservative) - KETTON WARD
Mrs Janine Rodger (Conservative) - COTTESMORE WARD
Mrs Heather Wells (Conservative) - OAKHAM SOUTH WEST WARD

 then he moved to his table

"My Slim friend" Mr Mark Wells (Conservative) - OAKHAM SOUTH EAST WARD
"At the end" Mr Peter W Jones (Conservative) - OAKHAM SOUTH WEST WARD
 (not sure why Mr Jones was attending he did occasionally look up from his i pad to sneer)
 "At the end" Helen Brigs Chief Executive
one was absent earning money at a furniture fair in Cologne.
Mr Terry C King (Conservative) - EXTON WARD (Deputy Leader of the Council)
The questions continued, this included questions concerning Number Plates, Broadband, Cuts towards funding the Voluntary Organisations. A Mr Prescott was very unhappy, his funding had been cut by 60% he was concerned how were groups like his meant to continue and support Mr Cameron's Big Society. One lady expressed her concern and said what a good job Mr Prescot's organisation had been for her after Rutland County Council had destroyed her lively hood it appeared his service saved her from suicide.

(interestingly no one knows what the Big Society is meant to be and Mr Begy expressed the same. It clear to me either this Country or Rutland is in the Doo Doo taking a phrase from Mr Begy)

we moved onto more questions about RAF Cottesmore, HMP Ashwell, The Chief Excutives Salary, Highways, Village Schools, Environmental Issues and Transport.

There was lively debate  the public wanted more involvement, but the Council members were having none of it and frequently showed expressions of disapproval.

A very nice lady is having issues with her Village School I think she is a School governor, she said the Council was not responding to her, what she was saying echoed so much of what many other people have told me.'They don't listen, they don't return calls'

That may be due to the government sending Cllr Heather Wells and her colleagues of to China for some reason?

Another man said my Councillor does not answer my emails. Each complaint was answered by Mr Begy with contact me I will sort it. To be fair to him he does answer e-mails.

The Council needs to be transparent, as one lady requested

I say, listen to its people and be proactive.

Mr Begy thanked the staff for working through these difficult times.

The planned staffing cuts is expected to be around £2.3 million

He said £1.426 million had been saved so far.

A army member was present and he said when RAF goes there will be job creation as the personnel are moved their partners will be leaving retail jobs in the town. Mr Begy said a lot of them worked for the council.

He also said a lot of the junior staff live outside Oakham and the County, because they cant afford to live her, but the good news is most of the senior staff did live in Oakham and Rutland. 

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Rutland County Council 2011 photograph

Multum in parvo (Much in little)

Would anyone like to buy this building?

As the Chief Executive implements her cuts in staffing soon there won't be any need for such a large building. Chief Executive Helen Briggs has proposed remaining staff could start working from  home this year. The council has often complained this building is too small for its purpose.

Multum_in_parvo a twitter user suggests people like the Helen Briggs Take a pay cut. Sell the council office and move the HMP Prison site. I don't think the Council would need such a big site, I guess they could sell off all the properties and centralise them all. I think they should keep the security fencing Mrs Briggs would not want anyone intruding unwelcome into her building, she often needs reminding its not hers and its a public building.


Helen Briggs can be found on face book she has very few friends and no one likes her employer Rutland County Council? and only two like her past Council employers.


Of course we all know Councillors and there friends don't join Facebook to communicate with friends or make new ones, it is another form of checking on what is be said and in my case before I switched mine to private, making notes of your friends and family and stealing photographs to post filthy comments in their names on my blog.


It does not surprise me to see who are Helen Briggs friends. Cuddly Nick, Jones and Clone Zone King. (sorry could not resist repeating the name given by his friends from the forum)


What does surprise me is Helen Briggs lists her music interests as Punk Rock, were Punk Rockers anti establishment or just bullies?

If she is a true Punk Rocker? then why does she attempt to suppress any one who speaks about the council?

Happy New Year Mrs Briggs I hope your monitors enjoy reading this post.

PS. Could you clean the pool car, I know its leased but its a disgrace. 


If you do use Face Book please take time to go into your privacy settings so you information can not be misused like mine was. 

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Helen Briggs Chief Executive of Rutland County Council

I received a letter from the ever busy Helen Briggs Chief Executive of Rutland County Council.




Before I start my rant I must state if the administration of Oakham Town Council was not so poor and I had full access to the office I would not have received this letter from Helen Briggs

I wont’ waste her time by replying directly I am blogging comments; It is my understanding she finds time during her busy work schedule to read my blog. According to my Google analytics my blog is visited around 50+ times each day by User of the Rutland County Council Computers.

Dear Mr Brookes

I am aware that in recent weeks you have spent a considerable amount of time at the offices of RCC with Council officer raising a number of issues,

(My Comment: This is due to the open ended ban imposed on me by Oakham Town Council. I am banned from calling into Oakham Town Council Offices because they accept without investigation I bully the ineffective Town Clerk.)

You have written numerous letters to a variety of officers. This has taken up a considerable amount of time and I concerned that the requirement for a disproportionate amount of resource, often at short notice and interfering with normal workloads is becoming a regular occurrence dealing with your issues.

(My Comment: This letter does not surprise me, when you have a council who are happy with its self for improving staff days lost to sickness in the last quarter a total of 4,972 days were lost.

A planning department tells you an enquiry will take a month and 3 month later your still waiting and James tells you it due to lack of staff, It’s not surprising RCC have resorted to seeking injunctions to stop the public visiting, I am also aware of public high court actions taken against RCC. The performance Management Reports for the last quarter show many of RCC failings.)

Mrs Briggs then goes on to instruct me:

I therefore propose that from the date of receipt of this letter:-

1 you will have a single point of contact with Council – Mr G Pook.

(My comment: a wise choice the Head of Legal Services one of the council’s most expensive resources. I must say he has been very helpful up to a point. I have found Mrs Stokes a lot more helpful. Of course Mr Pook was not as an efficient when he was chief executive at another Council they sacked him and replaced him with 6 litter pickers. Maybe something Rutland County Council could consider, here in Rutland litter and dog poo is a big issue we could employ 10 if Mrs Briggs departed.)

2 All face to face contact with Mr Pook will take place at a pre arranged time fortnightly for a period of 1 hour

(My comment: I am sure he is frilled no coffee please I would not want to add to costs.)

3. All any correspondence with this council should be directed to Mr Pook. Any that is not will be forwarded to Mr Pook to acknowledge and reply. Consolidated replies to all written correspondence will be provided every 10 working days.

(My Comment 10 days! Wow! That’s some target I have been waiting five years+ to resolve issues with my own private property lease. Members of the public will be flocking to me for help with that guarantee.)

Your issues will continue to be dealt with in accordance with our procedures; this is merely a mechanism to manage the amount of officer time spent addressing your issues.

(My feeling is Mrs Briggs who is over paid poor value for money is a little upset I complained to her bosses and sent a complimentary letter about another member of staff who probably deserves more pay)

She then confirms receipt of my letters of 16th and 17th May which have been passed to Mr Pook.

(Final Comment if Mrs Briggs did her job correctly the Council would be performing better. The people of Rutland would not be paying the highest council tax in the land. If she appointed someone to sort out her parish Council Oakham Town Council she would not feel such pressure and I would not visit the council office as much as she dislikes. We have a Town Clerk who gives you the wrong advice and shouts bully when you complain. We only have to put up with this poor council for another year Next year is Election year! The public won’t forget the mess her team with Cllr Heather Wells has made of the education system here in Rutland. Rutland County Council is a bigger problem than Oakham Town Council. They have also forgotten they serve the public. There are a few Cllr’s who try very hard and a large majority of old style Conservatives who are greedy and selfish, I believe one Tory did mention the nasty part of the party. You only have to attend any meeting to see this. A leader who is more concerned about the cost of a cup of coffee than the 16 complaints made to standards about one member of the cabinet last year. I would guess it maybe him as it is public knowledge one was published regarding his lack of manners. The other 15 remain unpublished by the local independent media. Then there is another cabinet member who was so drunk he could not remember anything of the event a member of the public had raised. Although he does remember the complainant is a bar owner and did mention to me he would deal with the issue when the license review came up. I am not naming this Cllr who sits on the licensing committee because I will provide the bar owner with a statement if he needs it for an appeal.)