Just received a copy of a letter sent to the Rutland Times and Rutland Mercury Editor
The Editor, Rutland Times and Mercury                                                                                
 5 November 2011
Sir,
I refer  to articles you published with such bias and inaccuracy in the Rutland  Times of 3 November ‘Councillor broke code of conduct,’ and in the  Rutland Mercury of 4 November ‘Councillor breached rules six times.’
It is a pity that the local paper fails to send reporters to Oakham Town Council meetings.  If  you did so you would ascertain that Cllr Brookes tries to keep the  Council fiscally and democratically responsible, and it is an uphill  battle.  He is reported by you as having ‘displayed an obscene poster on an official notice board.’  However  you failed to report that this was a copy of a malicious posting, which  was put onto his web page by those who seek to limit Cllr Brookes’  effectiveness in representing local constituents.  Both  Cllr Brookes and the person in whose name they were fraudulently and  maliciously posted, complained to the police and the police took no  action, refusing to give the incident a crime number.
Subsequently  a complaint to Police Standards found that Inspector Monks had a ‘point  of learning’ attached to his personnel file in relation to his inaction  in this incident.  I note that the local paper failed to publish the true details of this event.  With such biased reporting is it any wonder that the local paper fails to thrive.  The press should hold those in local democracy to account.  The  fact that your paper is so far in bed with those in power on our  Council that is fails to report on serious matters of financial  impropriety leads one to suspect that your paper is nothing more than a  propaganda sheet for the ruling party.  There is  much to be concerned about locally both on Oakham Town Council and at  Rutland County Council, most of it due to the financial mess they are  creating. 
Local  Councillors appear to believe they have some sort of ‘divine right’ and  when, at the local elections in May, the Chief Executive of RCC and  Conservatives on RCC tried to steal an election for a local  Conservative, Peter Jones, your paper failed to report the thorough  undermining of the democratic processes and five recounts.  Is  it any wonder that at times Cllr Brookes has occasionally taken steps  to ensure that members of the local Conservative Party are exposed for  the way in which they conduct themselves?
(Name and address provided )
 
